Tag: Republicans
Megan McCain continues to pimp herself out to the Liberals
I thought I was done with this topic, seeing I already ripped this feckless bitch a new one once already.
But it seems that the prissy one is not too keen on being messed with over her weight….
The Video:
My response is simple; you’re all ass bitch, where do you want me to start?
Laura Ingraham is not buying it either:
Memo to Meghan McCain: Enjoy the media coverage while it lasts, but know you’re being used. You are the flavor of the month in left-wing media land because you are a Republican bashing the GOP. Likewise, your dad is most popular among the same people when he is slamming his Republican brethren in full-blown “maverick” fashion. At least he backs up his views with a lifetime of sacrifice and public service. What is Ms. McCain’s own political, business, or real-world experience that lends credibility to her argument that the GOP needs to “moderate” (read: abandon its core principles)?
Now the Left is seizing on one satirical line from our show to paint Meghan as the victim of a right-wing hate crime. This comes from the same playbook responsible for the ongoing demonization of Rush Limbaugh — where his take on President Obama’s economic policies are misrepresented as some kind of attack on America.
The left’s over-heated indignation over my throw-away satirical line in a five-minute monologue is totally phony. They look the other way when obvious personal attacks are used against conservatives. Remember when Al Franken was the toast of all media for his book “Rush Limbaugh is a Big Fat Idiot”? Last month The View’s Joy Behar called him a “fat guy”; and when I was a guest on The View a few years back she ridiculed Ann Coulter and me as “peroxide” blondes on Fox.
Next time, just for fun, Meghan should pretend that she’s had a change of heart and is now a pro-life conservative. Then she’ll really see how the Mean Girls treatment feels.
I got to say that I agree. Little miss prissy is pimping herself out to the left, all to get on there and yowl about how the “Far Right” or as it is commonly known; Conservatives with principles, are so mean and nasty. That my friends is a damn sellout. You don’t whore yourself out to the far left or the left in general and then expect the Conservatives and/or Republicans to still love you and think you are so cool.
The plain facts are that Megan McCain needs to take her silly prissy ass back to Democratic Party where she belongs, because it is quite obvious that she is not a real Conservative, but rather one of those wishy-washy Faux Conservatives, like we have in Congress now. Which explains why Obama is getting away with Taxing and Spending this country into a hole.
Let me state this again. Her point on Ann Coulter was very valid. But for Megan to get on a lefty network and do what she has done. Invalidates her claim. Just that simple.
Wow, waddya know? I made a posting about her and no f-bombs. 😀 I’m getting better at this. 😉 😛 😀
(H/T AllahPundit @ HotAir.com)
Democrat Actor Turned Conservative Patriot; Ron Silver, has passed
Such a sad buzzkill for the weekend:
Actor and longtime political activist Ron Silver died this morning, succumbing to a long battle with cancer, friends of the liberal Democrat-turned-GOP stalwart told The Post.
“Ron Silver died peacefully in his sleep with his family around him this morning,” said Robin Bronk, executive director of the Creative Coalition, which Silver helped create.
“He had been fighting esophageal cancer for two years and his family is making arrangements for a private service.”
Friends of Silver first told Post columnist Cindy Adams of the native New Yorker’s death.
The steely-eyed, blunt-talking Silver, 62, enjoyed a long career on the stage, TV and in movies, and most recently hosted a public affairs talk show on Sirius satellite radio.
A sad affair indeed. Rest now Ron. We’ll take it from here. 🙁
Others: Commentary, JammieWearingFool, Little Green Footballs, Pajamas Media, Althouse, Macsmind, Michelle Malkin, Sister Toldjah, NewsBusters.org, Conservatives4Palin.com, Roger L. Simon, Power Line
Of sellouts and asshats….
(Sorry for the limited posting today. My body clock slipped a spring… and I have been trying get it back on course. I just woke up from a nice nap; hopefully we’re back on track here.)
Seems like meatball Liberal linked to my previous Blog posting and parsed a quote of mine, and then took a line from my “About Me” page to discredit me. Which proves what I have known and seen all along; that when liberals know they are losing the fucking argument, they stoop to personal slander and smears. Ah well, it isn’t all that bad, I could use the traffic. 😀
Anyhow, Kyle Smith over at the post, writes a very funny piece about the so-called Moderate Republicans who selling out that party; like Magan McCain. More of this, please. 😛
Others: Don Surber, Sister Toldjah and Cold Fury
Memo to Megan McCain: You don’t speak for me, bitch
Michelle Malkin has once again done what the MSM cannot or will not do. Pointed out the hypocrisy of the so-called Communist loving, Liberal-lite Moderate Republicans.
What am I talking about? It appears that Megan McCain thinks this douche nozzle here is cool.
I am going to say what Michelle Malkin is just too damned nice to say……
Pick a fucking side Bitch.
Megan McCain, you’re either with us or you’re against us. You are either on the side of freedom loving Americans like me, who feel that ANY sort of big Government is wrong, or you are on the side of the idiot communist liberal left. Point.fucking.blank.
Either get your god damned fat ass on the side of real true patriotic Americans or get on the side of the socialist left.
…and as I said in my title of this blog entry. You do NOT speak for me, you rich assed, fat, Fake assed Conservative Bitch!
Update: I just wanted to add that while I agree that Laura was dumb for attacking Megan, especially with the weight thing, and I happen to think that Coulter’s schtick is getting old, as do many others, for Megan to go to liberals to decry the “Far right” is just out of bounds in my opinion.
Update #2: Robert Stacy McCain linked to me. Doggone. I feel downright important like. 😛 He’s a good ol’ feller. Even if he does go to Church on the wrong day. 😉 😛 😀
Update #3: For it is worth; I know I called Megan “fat” which I know isn’t true about her. But honestly? I could give a fuck less about it. Because the way I see it; that bitch sold every Conservative and Republican, of EVERY stripe up the river, when she went on Maddow’s show. Maddow is a fucking ultra-Liberal partisan hack and a Keith Olbermann wanna-be, who poses as a Non-Partisan. The unwritten rule in politics, is that you just DO NOT cross party lines to trash your own party. That is called being a SELL OUT. Quite frankly, now that she’s had her 15 minutes of attention whoredom, I wish she would just disappear.
Update #4: I closed the comments. Because I was tired of the official Megan McCain fan club members; which consist of about 10 guys and a fat girl from Texas, who were coming here leaving their rather stupid inane comments, and I was also tired of reading the self-righteous comments about my language. Two Words, Religious twirps; FUCK OFF. I do what I want. I don’t answer to your cereal box Religion, which has zero to do with Christ, and more to do with men. (and truthfully, little boys, just ask Axel Rose. Believe me, I know all about the sexual misdeeds as well. Been there, did that, almost got it myself. Luckily, the Lord was looking out for his boy.)
Update #5: Looks like little prissy britches went on “The View.”
Mark Steyn on debt to our kids
Mark Steyn on the debt that we’re leaving our Children:
Just between you, me, and the old, the late middle-aged and the early middle-aged: Isn’t it terrific to be able to stick it to the young? I mean, imagine how bad all this economic-type stuff would be if our kids and grandkids hadn’t offered to pick up the tab.
Well, OK, they didn’t exactly "offer" but they did stand around behind Barack Obama at all those campaign rallies helping him look dynamic and telegenic and earnestly chanting hopey-hopey-changey-changey. And "Yes, we can!"
Which is a pretty open-ended commitment.
Are you sure you young folks will be able to pay off this massive Mount Spendmore of multitrillion-dollar debts we’ve piled up on you?
"Yes, we can!"
We thought you’d say that! God bless the youth of America! We of the Greatest Generation, the Boomers and Generation X salute you, the plucky members of the Brokest Generation, the Gloomers and Generation Y, as in "Why the hell did you old coots do this to us?"
via Mark Steyn: Welcome, kids, to the Brokest Generation – Opinion – OCRegister.com.
Now, I realize that Steyn was being snarky. To be fair, much of this debt was brought on, long before Obama ever took office. But Obama sure did not do anything to stop the increase of that debt. In fact, Obama has added to it.
This whole idea of tax the rich, and spend out way out of a recession, is just bad all the way around. Mainly, because we are spending money that we do not even have. We are getting it from China, who is increasingly getting nervous about giving us this money; not to mention, they are becoming more hostile by the day.
So, while I think it is quite fun to blame the Democrats from everything from the weather to my inability to get laid. (
) Some things you just cannot put on one party or the other; because, quite frankly, both parties have done the dirty of adding to our national debt.
Others: Cold Fury and Pajamas Media
A startling and sobering reminder
It comes from a Magazine’s Blog that I keep in my RSS feeds.
I keep Chronicles Magazine’s Blog in iGoogle, because I like to read traditional Conservative writings. These writings are a welcome alternative to the Neo-Conservative blather that comes from some of the more popular Conservative blogs out there. Although, I will be the first to admit, many Conservative Blogs now are really getting back to their true Conservative roots, now that Obama is in the White House. Some of the blogs, admittedly attack Obama just for the sake of attacking a Democrat, some however, like Lew Rockwell and others like him, attack Obama for legit reasons.
Having said all the above, here’s an entry by Clyde N. Wilson, which makes a very valid and quite sobering point; which only reinforces my feeling that big Government is just not good Government.
Clyde Writes in an entry titled, “It can’t be repeated too often”:
Ruby Ridge. Your President George H.W. Bush sent a foreign assassin to murder (from hiding) an American woman standing in the door of her own home holding her baby.
Waco. Your President Clinton sent a military expedition to incinerate children who were unfortunate enough to be in company of adults who had offended the federal police apparatus.
9/11. Your federal government, with a $30 billion intelligence budget, could not prevent a bunch of unarmed felaheen (who should not even have been in the country to begin with) from killing over 3,000 people in our economic capital and destroying part of the military headquarters of our vaunted global empire.
Iraq. Your President Bush Minor lied to justify a failed war of agression. He sent the forces into an unnecessary war with inadequate equipment, despite a multibillion-dollar “defense” budget, and without a viable plan.
Many American citizens, probably in the thousands, have been murdered and otherwise victimised by illegal aliens because of your presidents’ deliberate decision not to enforce the laws, in order to put the interests of foreign politicians and domestic rich people over the welfare of citizens.
The Supreme Court and the federal bench for more than a half-century now have been dominated by evil people, unscrupulous petty tyrants, who have subverted the Constitution and laws, protected criminals from punishment, interfered in countless matters that are none of their business, overturned solemn decisions of the majority, and placed unjust burdens upon the people.
Nobody has ever been reprimanded (as far as I know), much less fired or punished for the above.
Not only is Clyde right on about this; there are two points can be taken away from the quote above. That truth is this:
- We never really punish our political leaders, some would say because the President is merely a puppet, being controlled by the bank cartels.
- Big centralized Government has never been, nor will it ever be, a good thing; it is bound to make screw ups, some small, and some, as presented above, quite large.
The Economist on Coulters sliding book sales
The Economist writes about Ann Coulter’s sinking book sales:
It’s a cultural sea change! Well, alright—it’s a steep decline in the fortunes of one conservative pundit, and one of the reasons for it may be the proliferation of other, angrier, or more specific conservative pundits such as Bernard Goldberg (media-bashing), Michael Savage (xenophobia), and John Ziegler (worship of Sarah Palin). A decade ago, Ms Coulter was the family doctor who made house calls. Now the kids are grown up and they need to see specialists for their needs.
via Colder and Coulter | Democracy in America | Economist.com.
I think also it’s just the plain fact that Coulter’s shtick has worn thin. I mean, getting on TV and dressing like a two dollar whore; all the while promoting Conservative ideas, has just worn thin with many people. Except for maybe her hardcore fans, which, every time she creates another stir, become less and less.
Do not misunderstand me here, Coulter is a pretty woman and quite smart. She would so much prettier, if she covered up and actually used that Cornell Degree brain of hers, for something besides a hat rack and hair holder.
An Interesting Movie
I post this because I believe that it is interesting. Alex Jones has always struck me as a kook. Someone amongst the “Tin Foil Hat” crowd. However, it is something interesting to watch.
Enjoy…
What do you think? Do you think that there is any truth to this?
Bristol Palin Continued
You know, I have to laugh at these Neo-Conservative Apologists over at NRO’s “The Corner”, who want to gloss over the moral failing of the daughter of the worst Vice-President pick that the Republican Party ever made.
Some lady named Lisa Schiffren over there writes:
For all of the high-minded discussion of marriage policy on these pages and elsewhere, to me it looks very late. That train left a while ago. Even Corner readers, who will discuss choosing life vs. abortion, with endless passion, do not get so worked up about marriage. Which is why all I have to say is, “poor girl.”
Uh, Lisa? How about saying something along the lines of this; So much for those so-called moral values that Bristol’s Mom supposedly promotes, not to mention that entire party. How ironic that the Republican Party, the party that almost breaks it’s back to promote morality, almost to the point of attempting to legislate it; picks a woman, who’s daughter cannot even keep herself until marriage!
Does anyone else, besides me, see the irony here? 😮
From the “Who gives two shits?!?!?” stack: Bristol Palin breaks it off with Levi Johnston
Oh Brother, If I want traffic, I have to report this stuff, here goes……
Via People.com:
Bristol Palin and her fiancé Levi Johnston have broken up, two sources tell PEOPLE.
The split happened "a few weeks ago," according to a source close to the couple, but it’s unclear what precipitated it. "It was a mutual thing," adds the source.
Bristol, the 18-year-old daughter of Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, spoke with FOX News in February and told Greta Van Susteren that she and Levi – who are parents to 2-month-old son, Tripp – expected to get married after they completed high school.
"It kind of just happened," says the source, referring to the split. "I thought they would stick it out. But I think they can work together to raise Tripp."
"I’m not sure what caused [them to break up] – it’s common knowledge," says another source who knows the family.
Despite the breakup, Levi still sees the couple’s son. Levi’s dad, Keith Johnston, told PEOPLE recently that his son is a devoted and "proud father."
Normally, I wouldn’t give two shits about stuff like this, but this right here bothered me:
Mercede told Star: "Bristol’s just crazy. That’s the nicest way I can put it. She and Levi actually broke up a while ago!"
Apparently, Levi is also far from being a hands-on dad. Said Mercede: "Levi tries to visit Tripp every single day, but Bristol makes it nearly impossible for him. She tells him he can’t take the baby to our house because she doesn’t want him around ‘white trash.’ She treats him so badly!"
Hmmmph, Bristol did not think that when she had her fucking legs in the air and was letting Levi ream her 17 year old vagina out.
Typical rich white bitch… 
Turns out Levi was nothing more than a fucking sperm donor. So, much for family values. This will be good fodder for anyone who wants to run against Sarah Palin, if she runs in 2012, which at this point, would be extremely stupid.
…and to think, we almost put that Alaskan freak show in the White House. 
Others: The Reaction, Pam’s House Blend, DownWithTyranny!, The Other McCain, protein wisdom, Anchorage Daily News, The Impolitic, Liberal Values, Conservatives4Palin.com, Debbie Schlussel,Anne Schroeder’s Blog, Alan Colmes’ Liberaland
Powerful Video
Via D=S:
On Douthat
Yes, I’ve heard about it. I really do not have anything negative to say about him going to the NYT. Douthat on the other hand, I found to be a bit snobbish. I once sent him an e-mail and never got a response. I suppose that Mr. Douthat, a beltway type; has no time for us amateur basement dwellers. Which is pretty fucking ironic, because that is how this whole blogging thing got started, by a bunch of basement dwellers who decided to start writing about politics; Liberal, Conservative, and yes even Libertarian…. and decided to make our own damned community.
I agree with the fact that Douthat will most likely will do better than David Brooks, and believe that is not saying much at all. Brooks was about a fucking idiot. He was a perfect example of the idiotic mumbling that comes out of the Neo-Conservative circles anymore. Which is why the Harlem globetrotter is in the White House now.
Anyhow, I hope he does well and gets his facts straight, because God-knows the Republican Party needs a image makeover right now.
Others; on the right and left: Balloon Juice, The Moderate Voice, The Daily Dish, Blog P.I., Conservatives4Palin.com, pandagon.net, The New Republic, Crunchy Con, The Reaction, MoJo Blog Posts, Outside The Beltway, Liberal Values, Whiskey Fire, AmSpecBlog, Hugh Hewitt’s TownHall Blog, Majikthise, Donklephant and Matthew Yglesias
(Via Memeorandum)
An Interesting Video
Okay, I’d like some feedback on this video here. (H/T to this guy)
Not sure what to think…. Opinions Please.
The only part I really disagreed with is, the part about a Republican style of Government. I do not believe that it was referring to the modern day Republican Party, But rather was referring to a Republic style of Government and not the actual party itself. This would be in contrast to British Monarchy or a, dare I say it? A Socialist Democracy. 😀
Again, feedback, Please, comment!
(Via Freedoms Phoenix)
The Obligatory Charles Freeman withdrawal from appointment posting
I think that this is a good thing, for a number of reasons.
Charles Freeman, the Obama administration’s choice to head the National Intelligence Council, has withdrawn from consideration after facing strong opposition from Senate Republicans.
Freeman is the latest in a string of Obama administration appointees and nominees to withdraw in the past few weeks.
Senate Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) told The Hill that Freeman has withdrawn his nomination and that Director of National Intelligence Dennis Blair agreed to accept the decision. Blair released a statement late Tuesday announcing Freeman’s decision.
The withdrawal came hours after Freeman agreed to testify before the Senate intelligence panel on Thursday to answer questions raised in recent days. All seven Republicans on the panel had sent a letter to Blair raising concerns about Freeman’s experience and objectivity.
Earlier on Tuesday Feinstein told The HIll she was keeping an open mind on Freeman’s appointment.
“I’ve talked to director Blair about it. Director Blair feels this is not a policy job, that he’s well qualified for what he wants him to do,” Feinstein said. “I feel presidents should have their choice if possible of appointments. I’ve read Mr. Freeman characterized in a number of different of ways. We’d like an opportunity to talk with him and get our own fix on these views. How strongly their held, whether in fact there is bias.”
via TheHill.com – Controversial intelligence pick withdraws.
The reason why I say this, is because of this little quote right here: (H/T HotAir.com)
MR. FREEMAN: On the question of U.S. strikes on targets on Iran or elsewhere, I simply want to register what I think is an obvious point; namely that what 9/11 showed is that if we bomb people, they bomb back.
Ed Morrisey provides that perfect reply to this, that I agree with 100%:
Uh, what? Starting in 1993, al-Qaeda conducted a series of attacks on American targets, including the World Trade Center, Khobar Towers, two American embassies in Africa, and the USS Cole. We didn’t attempt to bomb them until 1998, when we missed them entirely, thanks to a collapse in operational security. We didn’t bomb the Saudis or Yemenis at any point, the two nationalities to which Osama bin Laden can lay claim, or Egypt, where Ayman al-Zawahiri was born.
The point is here that this guy was obviously among the anti-Zionist crowd, like these guys here.
Let me be absolutely clear, I am not a huge fan of the Evangelical Zionist crowd; whom are famous for thier doctrinal error and unholy alliances with unbelievers and unsaved, but to have someone who obviously was trying to blame Israel and America for the 9/11 attacks, was not very smart move by the Obama Administration.
So, in this case, yeah, I believe this was a good thing for this clown to remove his name for consideration. Maybe he will get a job with the American Free Press crowd, God knows, that is where he belongs. 🙄
….and before any Conspiracy theory meatballs come in here and try and chide me, feel free, with a push of one button, I can ban your stinking IP address and you won’t even be able to view this blog. So, bring it on boys, I wanna weed out the idiots. 😡
Others: Weekly Standard, Ben Smith’s Blogs, Michelle Malkin, War in Context, The Hill’s Blog Briefing Room, Wall Street Journal, Newshoggers.com, The Strata-Sphere
(Via Memeorandum)
Why I totally reject the so-called “Warning” from David Wilkerson
I noticed here as of lately that on WorldNetDaily, that David Wilkerson has issued a so-called “Warning” and advice to Christians everywhere about some so-called horrific event that is going to take place.
I want it to be known publicly, that I feel that David Wilkerson has had nothing more than an overactive imagination. Which is about all Pentecostals ever have.
I say this, because David Wilkerson is nothing more than a Pentecostal Christian, he is one of the many deluded Christians that possess the flawed belief system, that God is still speaking today, that healing was promised in the atonement, that “Speaking in tongues” is a legit belief system; despite that the fact that the Bible proves that very wrong.
In the interest of full disclosure, I am a former Pentecostal, who came out of that silly bunch of nonsense, after 21 years, of watching that movement steadily veer towards liberal Christianity. I am now a Fundamentalist Christian, my doctrine is of the Baptist nature.
There are a bunch of articles that bring out the nonsensical beliefs that Pentecostals Teach, I highly recommend them to read:
- STRANGE EARLY HISTORY OF PENTECOSTALISM – read this one first!
- BEWARE OF ALLEGED TRIPS TO HEAVEN
- BEWARE OF ALLEGED VISIONS OF JESUS
- BEWARE OF THE DOCTRINE THAT MIRACLES PRODUCE FAITH
- BEWARE OF SPIRITUAL DRUNKENNESS
- BEWARE OF SPIRIT SLAYING
- HOLINESS: THE FALSE AND THE TRUE
- I BELIEVE IN MIRACLES
- PENTECOSTAL-CHARISMATIC TONGUES vs. the BIBLE
- PENTECOSTALISM, EXPERIENCE AND SCRIPTURE
- A PRIVATE PRAYER LANGUAGE?
- WHY ARE PEOPLE DELUDED BY CHARISMATIC ERROR?
More stuff to read about these sort of Christians and their evangelical counterparts:
- THE WORLD COUNCIL OF CHURCHES
- BEWARE OF BLUE LIKE JAZZ
- BEWARE OF VELVET ELVIS
- IS IT POSSIBLE TO BE SAVED THROUGH CHRIST WITHOUT BELIEVING IN CHRIST?
- ROBERT WEBBER
- THE EMERGENT CHURCH: A MAGNET FOR REBELS
- THE EMERGING CHURCH IS COMING
- THE INCARNATIONAL DOCTRINE
- A VISIT TO THE VINEYARD CHURCH, ANAHEIM, CA
- THE ALPHA COURSE/EVANGELICAL BIBLE STUDIES
- BASKIN-ROBBINS CHRISTIANITY
- BEWARE OF BRENNAN MANNING
- BEWARE OF TONY CAMPOLO
- BILLY GRAHAM’S SAD DISOBEDIENCE TO THE WORD OF GOD
- BREAKING DOWN DENOMINATIONAL BARRIERS
- C.S. LEWIS
- DANGERS ON CHRISTIAN RADIO
- DANGERS IN CHRISTIAN BOOKSTORES
- EVANGELICALS AND MODERNIST ROBERT SCHULLER
- EVANGELICALS AND MORMONS TOGETHER
- JOHN WIMBER AND THE VINEYARD
- GRAHAM WAS WARNED MANY TIMES
- NEW EVANGELICALISM: ITS HISTORY, CHARACTERISTICS AND FRUIT
- THE DENOMINATIONS TODAY
- WHEN DID GRAHAM’S COMPROMISE BEGIN?
- TAKING THE FIRE OUT OF HELL
Hope this helps, Remember everything that the God himself has said and everything that Jesus has ever said, is contained in those 66 book, of that thing we call the Bible. Everything else is a well funded and orchestrated FRAUD!
By the way, I am a King James Bible believer, here are some articles that back up, what I believe:
- APOSTASY AND TEXTUAL CRITICISM
- ARE THE MODERN VERSIONS BASED ON WESTCOTT-HORT?
- A.T. ROBERTSON: EVANGELICAL POPULARIZER OF MODERN TEXTUAL CRITICISM
- THE BIBLE’S PROOF
- BIBLICAL INSPIRATION
- BIBLICAL PRESUPPOSITIONS ON THE BIBLE VERSION ISSUE
- DYNAMIC EQUIVALENCY: ITS INFLUENCE AND ERROR
- DIFFERENCES IN KJV AND WESTCOTT-HORT
- IN THE FOOTSTEPS OF THE BIBLE TRANSLATORS
- KING JAMES ONLY
- IS THE BIBLE VERSION ISSUE WORTH FIGHTING OVER?
- IS THE KING JAMES BIBLE TOO ANTIQUATED AND DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND?
- IS THE RECEIVED TEXT BASED ON A FEW LATE MANUSCRIPTS?
- MEN OF GOD WHO FORESAW THE FRUIT OF THE MODERN TEXTS AND VERSIONS
- MY POSITION ON THE KING JAMES BIBLE
- STRAINING AT GNATS
- THE MODERN TEXTS AND VERSIONS HAVE PRODUCED THE FRUIT OF THEOLOGICAL MODERNISM
- THE TESTIMONY OF DR. EDWARD F. HILLS
- THE UNITED BIBLE SOCIETIES AND ROME
- THE UNGODLY FRUIT OF MODERN TEXTUAL CRITICISM
- TEXTUAL CRITICISM IS DRAWN FROM THE WELLS OF INFIDELITY
- WHAT ABOUT ERASMUS?
- WHAT ABOUT PETER RUCKMAN?
- UNREGENERACY AND THE BIBLE SOCIETIES
- UNITARIANISM AND THE MODERN VERSIONS
- WYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATORS AND ROME
Some books to read about the false doctrine of Pentecostalism:
The “so-called’ Collapse of Evangelical Christianity.
I have my doubts about this:
We are on the verge – within 10 years – of a major collapse of evangelical Christianity. This breakdown will follow the deterioration of the mainline Protestant world and it will fundamentally alter the religious and cultural environment in the West.
Within two generations, evangelicalism will be a house deserted of half its occupants. (Between 25 and 35 percent of Americans today are Evangelicals.) In the “Protestant” 20th century, Evangelicals flourished. But they will soon be living in a very secular and religiously antagonistic 21st century.
This collapse will herald the arrival of an anti-Christian chapter of the post-Christian West. Intolerance of Christianity will rise to levels many of us have not believed possible in our lifetimes, and public policy will become hostile toward evangelical Christianity, seeing it as the opponent of the common good.
Millions of Evangelicals will quit. Thousands of ministries will end. Christian media will be reduced, if not eliminated. Many Christian schools will go into rapid decline. I’m convinced the grace and mission of God will reach to the ends of the earth. But the end of evangelicalism as we know it is close.
All this written by a news service which was started by a group of kooks, calling themselves “Christians”. Christian Science is a cult, Started by Mary Baker Eddy. It has been discarded by mainline Christianity for years.
So, in the opinion of this Fundamental Baptist. Take this with a gain of salt.
Others: Crunchy Con, Outside The Beltway, Macsmind, The Other McCain
A quick update from Zo from Macho Sauce Productions
It turns out, that Zo is getting help from the Neo-Conservative PJ TV. I just wonder how long before he starts reciting talking points of the Podhoretz Clan?
Anyhow, here’s the video:
Mudville Gazette discovers the obvious
That B. Hussien Obama is a big fat liar. (As are most Democrats.)
I must admit, Patterico does have a good point
I normally wouldn’t link this guy, but he does have a very valid point.
Basically, Patterico says that the Democrats have zero right to criticize we Conservatives for wanting Bambi to fail. Why?
This: (click to make it bigger)
Basically, in 2006, there was a poll taken, where 53% of Democrats said that they hope that Bush failed. (Poll is in PDF format…)
So, as Patterico says:
Have this poll handy the next time some Democrat gets snooty about Rush wanting Obama to fail. It’s proof that the Democrats didn’t want Bush to succeed. They have no standing to claim the moral high ground. None.
I cannot say that I disagree with this. The Democrats from the time that the Iraq war started turning bad, till the day Bush left office, would not cut George W. Bush any slack at all. I even, once the surge started, gave him a little slack to see if it worked, Obama and his Democratic partners in crime, like over at the DailyKos, would not, at all. To this day, Obama refuses to admit that the Surge in Iraq worked.
Update: Oh, before anyone asks; No, I was not cool with the idea of going into Iraq; especially when the whole WMD thing came up as bogus. But, I was willing to give the President a break and let him get the situation straightened out there. The Liberal Left? Not so much. All one had to do, is tune into MSNBC or CNN and listen to the talking heads criticize Bush.
Good show Patterico, even if you did try and slander me over at another Blog, by bringing up crap that happened over a year ago, and something I totally apologized for. 😛
Others: Flopping Aces and Sister Toldjah
Uh-Oh: Iran Test Fires New Missile
Um…. I hope Barry is not too tired to deal with this one:
Iran has test-fired a new air-to-surface missile, Iranian media reported on Sunday, in the Islamic Republic’s latest display of its military capability.
The missile test was carried out despite the offer by the administration of new U.S. President Barack Obama to engage Iran in direct talks if it “unclenches its fist”.
Iran’s Fars News Agency said the domestically produced missile had a range of 110 km and was designed for use by military aircraft against naval targets.
“Now these jet fighters have acquired a new capability in confronting threats,” the semi-official news agency said. Iran’s Press TV initially said a long-range missile had been tested, but later also used Fars’ way of describing it.
Iran often stages war games or tests weapons to show its determination to counter any attack by foes such as Israel and the United States.
Israel and Washington accuse Tehran of trying to develop nuclear bombs. Iran says its nuclear programme is a peaceful drive to generate electricity so that the world’s fourth-largest oil producer can export more of its gas and crude.
Israel, believed to be the only nuclear-armed Middle East state, has said Iran’s nuclear plans threaten its existence and has not ruled out military action if diplomacy fails to end the dispute.
….and Yet, President Bambi wants to try and hold talks with these crazy people? I fear for our country. 🙁
I think Bush was right, as were many Republicans who said, that Obama would rather appease terrorists, than stiff arm those who promote Terrorism.
What gets me is, how Bush was lambasted for making that Statement; and at the time, I thought he was kind of off for saying that myself. Now, I believe that Bush was absolutely correct. The truth is, Iran is a country that is a supporter of terrorism. I mean, terrorism of Israel and all of its allies, including the United States.
The question is, how will President Obama respond to this? Will he ignore it or will He stand up and condemn this sort of an action?
The answer will most likely come….. When Obama is done with his nap. 🙄
(H/T Drudge)
Sorry Ann, It’s still juvenile
Kinda like every other fucking thing she writes nowadays.
Ann Coulter, taking a break from giving oral sex to FBI agents to get out of voter fraud charges; attacks Olbermann over his degree.
Keith responds, as he has every right to, and Coulter goes on Faux Noise’s “Redeye”, which is honestly one of the world’s unfunniest shows ever, and rips on Keith some more.
Honestly; does this feckless harpy really think she is doing anything to further the Conservative Movement by engaging in rather idiotic and very stupid juvenile pissing matches like this one?
No wonder the Liberals think that the Conservative movement is full of nut jobs and wackos! I mean the hypocrisy of the woman is so vast, it would take me about 5 pages of Blog posting to spell it all out. One that I care to waste my Blog’s bandwidth on, is this woman’s dress, this woman claims to be the Phyllis Schlafly of the 21 century. She does this all the while, dressing like a New York hooker. Let’s just say that modesty is not one of Ann Coulter’s fortes.
Tell ya what Annie, you start covering up your body, and quit trying to show your damn hoo-ha on TV and start acting like you’ve got a brain, which you do; you just act like some sort of a jackassed tool, to push your idiotically written books, and start actually writing something of fucking substance, and I might respect you.
….Otherwise, your just a whore in a long line of blond bimbo looking whores, who are either carping into a fucking mike to make money by reciting Republican talking points in New York for Rupert “I’m a fake Conservative” Murdoch, or writing and possibly giving head to for John Podhoretz and Willy Kristol to make some fucking coin.
Other Neo-Cons covering this waste of bandwidth: Cassy Fiano and Riehl World View
I must say that I agree with this
Once again, I am going to link to something that is going to cause some people to think that I am a fake Conservative. If that’s what some want to do; fine, let them.
But I will say it, that I totally agree with the assessment made in this Blog entry here.
I have always believed that Abortion in itself, was murder. However, I believe it is a MORAL issue and is not, nor should it ever be a legislative issue. A very great Libertarian Senator, Barry Goldwater Sr. once said, “You cannot legislate Morality.” Our laws are a reflection of society, to push a Religious dogma or belief system off on a society; goes against everything our Constitution stands for.
Further more, this sickening display by the Roman Catholic Church in Brasília is just plain awful.
Many times, I have criticized the so-called “Right to Life” groups as being border line Nazi Fascist in their ways, as is the Roman Catholic Church as well, at times.
Sometimes, I think, in the quest to be morally right, the Church, as it is referred to, comes off being very wrong.
God Bless this Famly and this little girl. 🙁