After attacking me as a racist and an Anti-Semite. Funny how that works, isnât it? đ 
Well, I’ll be dipped in doo doo. RedState.com, the site that brutally attacked me a long while back for being a racist and an Anti-Semite……is now doing the same damned thing.
Brownstein writes: âThe new data show that white voters not only strongly preferred Republican House and Senate candidates but also registered deep disappointment with President Obamaâs performance, hostility toward the cornerstones of the current Democratic agenda, and widespread skepticism about the expansive role for Washington embedded in the partyâs priorities. On each of those questions, minority voters expressed almost exactly the opposite view from whites.â Comment: Indeed, because these white voters are generally creative, ambitious, studious and self-reliant while many of todayâs blacks, whose lives are modeled after angry, nonproductive agitators like Jackson and Sharpton, are often the opposite.
Brownstein writes: âDavid Axelrod, Obamaâs chief political strategist, said in an interview that âit would be a mistake to take exit polls from a midterm election and extrapolate too farâ toward 2012. Conditionsâand the composition of the electorateâwill change a great deal by then, he said. But he acknowledged that Obama must âresetâ the public perception about his view of governmentâs role. AxelrodâŠÂ also made it clear that he sees as a âparticularly instructiveâ model for 2012 the case of Democratic Sen. Michael Bennet in Colorado, who won his contest last fall by mobilizing enough minorities, young people, and socially liberal, well-educated white women to overcome a sharp turn toward the GOP among most of the other white voters in his state.â Comment: âConditions⊠will change a great deal by thenâ? Hardly. The public has a very well-founded idea of where Obama stands and conditions are not going to change, or change that perception. And look at who is supporting Obama â well-educated white women who just might, over time, understand that his agenda is harming them and their own children. Many apparently are just not smart enough to know it yet even with all their advanced degrees⊠or because of them.
Brownstein writes: âMeanwhile, Republicans, with their 60 percent showing, notched the partyâs best congressional result among white voters in the history of modern polling.â Comment: And that number is not going to go down again. Because the media anger generated toward conservatism and Republicans always has been based on the theory that Democrats could do much better for the American people. Now the contrast between media rhetoric and reality is in.
Brownstein writes: âThe racial gulf was similar when voters were asked whether they believed that Obamaâs policies would help the nation in the long run. By 70 percent to 22 percent, minorities said yes; by 61 percent to 34 percent, whites said no.â Comment: Because whites are generally well-disciplined higher-income people who generate wealth and pay taxes to the government. Meanwhile many blacks are collecting money and benefits from the government at a level that is absolutely unsustainable.
Brownstein writes: âDemocrats have been losing support among blue-collar white voters since the 1960s, but in this election, they hit one of their lowest points ever. In House campaigns, the exit poll found, noncollege whites preferred Republicans by nearly 2-to-1 with virtually no gender gap: White working-class womenâthe so-called waitress momsâgave Republicans almost exactly as many of their votes as blue-collar men did.â Comment: That is why they are referred to as âworking classâ voters. Because they know what it means to really work for a living and get their hands dirty, not live on some elite college campus or work in a media newsroom or sit in a law office or collect welfare or work at a do-nothing government job. This is something that liberals do not understand â what it means to really work for a living.
Brownstein writes: âRodolfo de la Garza, a political scientist at ColumbiaUniversity who studies Hispanicsâ attitudes, says⊠More minority workers hold marginal positions in the private economy⊠so they were less likely to be shocked by the severity of the downturnâand more likely to turn to government, rather than the private sector, to help survive it. âThey didnât lose money on Wall Street; they had shitty jobs, if they had jobs, so where would they look to if not the [government]?â de la Garza asked.â Comment: And why do âminority workers hold marginal positions in the private economyâ and need to look to the government? How about their poor academic achievement and dropout rate. How about their refusal to learn English. How about their lack of skills, education and ambition to better themselves. How about their terrible schools run by Democrat teacher unions. How about young black males walking around with their underwear hanging out and Democrats defending them at every turn. That is why they have âshitty jobsâ, professor.
Brownstein writes: âMerle Black, a political scientist at Emory University, says that (white) blue-collar disaffection from Democratic candidates reflects not only immediate economic distress but also a longer-term process of alienation from the party. âThe noncollege whites ⊠see themselves as a declining minority within the national Democratic Party, where they have very little control or influence on the policies,â he says. âThe party is controlled by the coastal elites and nonwhites, and that is a very different kind of Democratic Partyâ than a generation ago.âComment: Indeed. Working white people never have supported the kind of radicalism in the Democrat party today. As the old saying goes, âI did not abandon the Democrat party. The Democrat party abandoned me.â
Brownstein writes: âCollege-educated white women, though not immune to these trends, displayed more resistance. Although traditionally the most liberal portion of the white electorate, even these women cooled toward Democrats last year. In contrast to the majority support they provided Obama in 2008, they voted 55 percent to 43 percent for Republicans in 2010 House races. In the exit poll, most of them agreed that government was trying to do too much, and a slim majority of them said they wanted Congress to repeal the health care law.âComment: Because some of these women finally are using their education to look at what is happening around them rather than reading about reality according toThe New York Times. Itâs about time these females wised up like we conservative men have been suggesting for decades now.
Brownstein writes: âAccording to veteran conservative strategist Jeff Bell, all signs suggest that Obama has permanently antagonized much of the white electorate (nearly half of which this year identified itself as conservative in the exit poll). âThe significance of the tea party is that it is not a situational vote,â says Bell, the policy director at the American Principles Project, a right-leaning advocacy group. âThey are going to be militant even if, or when, the economy improves.⊠Itâs significant if you have more voters who are willing to vote with the conservative coalition regardless of whatâs going on with the economy.âComment: Very good observation. White Tea Party activists are not going to sway even with an improving economy. They are smart people who will always remember how the Democrats manhandled America between 2008 and 2010. They are not going to let it happen again. They finally understand the Democrats all too well.
Wow…. Just Wow…
Screenshots in case it disappears: (click to make them biggerâŠ.)
Hypocrisy, thy name is RedState.
I mean, I could understand if it was Altright.com; but Redstate? Wow⊠That is interesting⊠đź
Update: ….and just like that, the posting disappears. But, the internet, is forever. Click here to see the cached version over google.com.
Like the folks at RedState.com told me a good few months back:
The Internet always remembers, Mr. Adkins. And weâll remember the next time you pop up your racist head, too.
Likewise Mr. Erickson, the internet always remembers YOUR racism and your straight up hypocrisy. Because I dispise those who say one thing and do another — I will continue to expose this sort of nonsense and call it for what it is. You and your crown princess of the Neo-Conservative movement Michelle Malkin, and the rest of the Neo-Conservative Blogosphere; who say one thing and do another, as usual. What is very shocking to me, is that CNN; a very respectable organization actually has this assclown on their network. It is a sad and very sick thing.
