Oh Lordy. They have let Darth Vader out of his lair again…. đ
Two things, he thinks Joe Biden is an idiot, and he supports homos.
Lovely.
That is all.
This blog is no longer active as of October 31, 2011

Oh Lordy. They have let Darth Vader out of his lair again…. đ
Two things, he thinks Joe Biden is an idiot, and he supports homos.
Lovely.
That is all.
It’s about damned time Sam:
Wurzelbacher touched on several different points during his speech, and many of them were surprising. He said he doesnât support Sarah Palin anymore. Why? Because sheâs backing John McCainâs re-election effort. âJohn McCain is no public servant,â he told the room, calling the 2008 Republican nominee a career politician.
I pointed out heâd just be plain old Sam Wurzelbacher of Ohio â Joe the Plumber wouldnât exist â without McCain. His response was blunt. âI donât owe him sâ. He really screwed my life up, is how I look at it.â
Wurzelbacher said, âMcCain was trying to use me. I happened to be the face of middle Americans. It was a ploy.â
So whyâs he still milking the Joe the Plumber image, appearing at conservative events across the country? Wurzelbacher says itâs his duty to take advantage of the platform heâs been given. He wants to talk up the issues he cares about, and encourage the grassroots tea party movement.
Wurzelbacher also told the room to lay off the extreme personal attacks on President Obama. He said people who question whether Obama was born in the United States or compare him to Hitler âbelittle and set backâ the conservative movement. âThe birthers, the truthers â if people are trying to bunch them [with tea partiers], that would kill us. That just pushes away Democrats and independents who might come out for our cause otherwise.â He said he actually likes Obama, in some ways. âI think his ideology is un-American, but heâs one of the more honest politicians. At least he told us what he wanted to do.â
via A few minutes with Joe the Plumber « State House Sound Bites.
I guess ol’ Sam is not as dumb as I thought he was. Good on him for calling it; like it truly is. Of course, Sam should remember, it was not McCain’s people who ordered his background investigated, it was Obama’s people that did that. However, I do agree with him on McCain. He’s nothing more than a idiotic RHINO. It is a pity that Sarah Palin is supporting the damned tool. Of course, what do you expect from a woman, who seems to believe that she’s entitled to be President, because she’s a woman?
H/T HotAir
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

The Winter of Their Discontent?

Speech Code Junkie?

Unseated? (So Bad, but quite funny!) đ
Seeing this story here is all the rage in the Blogosphere. I thought I would bring this to light.
Chuck Baldwin says:
As far as grassroots activism goes, the surge in Tea Parties across America is one of the more encouraging developments to recently take place. It reminds me of the “Conservative Revolution” of 1994, when the GOP reclaimed both the US Senate and House of Representatives. At that time, it had been over 40 years since the Republican Party controlled both the US House and Senate. And, between the two, the House victories were the most significant.
Spurred mostly by the election of Bill Clinton in 1992, a host of young, energetic freshman Republicans marched into Washington, D.C., determined to return a burgeoning and out-of-control federal leviathan to the constitutional precepts of limited government. I’m talking about then-freshman House members such as Helen Chenoweth, Steve Largent, Bob Barr, Joe Scarborough, Sonny Bono, John Shadegg, J.C. Watts, etc. These young conservatives went to Washington, D.C., determined to reduce the growth and size of the federal government.
The vehicle used to transport these young conservatives from grassroots activism to US House and Senate seats was the highly touted “Contract with America” (CWA), which was orchestrated by House Speaker-to-be, Newt Gingrich. The CWA included a promise to the American people that if they would give the GOP a majority in Congress, they would eliminate up to 5 federal departments–such as the Departments of Energy and Education–and many federal agencies.
Obviously, not only did the GOP-controlled Congress not eliminate a single federal department or agency–or even shrink the size of the federal government at all–it expanded the size and scope of the federal government at every level. And there is one reason for it: Big Government neocons posing as champions of conservatism co-opted and destroyed the Conservative Revolution of 1994.
The Tea Parties of 2010 remind me very much of the Conservative Revolution of 1994. And if the Tea Party Nation is not very careful, they will succumb to the same fate. The signs of a silent takeover of the movement are already appearing
If one wants to put names to these treasonous wretches (and I do), I’m talking about charlatans such as Newt Gingrich and Trent Lott. Anyone who thinks that Newt Gingrich is a real conservative or that he will do anything to reduce the size and scope of the federal government needs to speak with any of those Republican members of the freshman class of 1994. (Sadly, too, some of the members of that great freshman class went on to become Big Government toadies themselves. Such is the power of that Putrid Province by the Potomac.)
Hmmmm, I wonder if Jim Hoft will call Baldwin a racist too? It is to wonder. đ
Further Meltdown on the Hill:
House Speaker Nancy Pelosiâs increasingly public disagreements with President Barack Obama are a reflection of something deeper: the seething resentment some Democrats feel over what they see as cavalier treatment from a wounded White House.
For months, the California lawmaker has been pushing Obama hard in private while praising him in public. But now sheâs being more open in her criticism, in part because she feels the White House was wrong â in the wake of the Democratsâ loss in Massachusetts â to push the Senate health care bill on the House when she knew there was no way it would pass.
Earlier this month, Pelosi criticized the presidentâs State of the Union call to exempt defense spending from a budget freeze. And in a White House meeting with leaders of both parties this week, she questioned the effectiveness of his plan to give small businesses tax breaks to hire workers.
âWhat youâre seeing now in public has been building in private,â said a top House Democratic official. âHouse members did their work â they did everything the president asked of them. And it gets stuck in the Senate. Or the Senate screws it up.â
via Family feud: Nancy Pelosi at odds with President Obama – POLITICO.com.
That is what happens when Democrats overreach and make promises that they cannot keep. Another Example:
âHe wants a jobs bill, we get a jobs bill,â the official said. âHe wanted health care, we got health care. Then the answer is, âYou just need to twist enough arms to pass the Senate bill.â You can twist arms if youâve got a handful of them to twist. You canât twist over 100 arms. There needs to be some reality check there.â
âBoth ends of the Capitol â the House and the Senate â are starting to wonder if theyâre on their own,â the official continued. âYou have a lot of frustration there. And the White Houseâs reaction to all of that seems to be, âRun against Congressâ â which, as you can imagine, doesnât go over very well with House members. The White House reaction seems to be, âPosition ourselves against Congress.ââ
See, the problem is this here. The President seems to forget that the Congress; that being the House and Senate, have people running those offices, and not robots. Those people actually have to answer to their constituents, and going around doing the will of the President and ignoring those who elected you, can lead to one’s ouster from his office. You would think that the President would be smart enough to know this. No, I am not saying that President is outright dumb; I just think that the President had some sort of crazy idea of some sort that when he took office and the Democrats got the majority that the Democrats and Republicans would just roll over and let him run roughshod over them. We see now that this just was not the case. This is a good thing, I believe this is why the America people’s involvement in politics is very necessary in this time of great uncertainty.
Others: Wall Street Journal,  Left Coast Rebel, , Hot Air,Wake up America
….and does his best flip flop ever!
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid led colleagues and the White House to believe he supported a bipartisan jobs bill â only to scuttle the plan as soon as it was released Thursday over concerns it could be used to batter Democratic incumbents, according to Senate sources.
Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.) and Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) worked for weeks with Reid’s blessing and frequent involvement to craft an $85 billion jobs bill, a measure that seemed destined to break the partisan logjam that has ground the Senate to a halt.
But as Baucus, Grassley and President Barack Obama were preparing to celebrate a rare moment of bipartisan Kumbaya on Thursday, Reid stunned a meeting of Senate Democrats by announcing he was scrapping Baucus-Grassley, replacing it with a much cheaper, more narrowly crafted, $15 billion version.
“Grassley and three to four Republicans would have voted for it, but all the other Republicans would have beaten the living sât out of us [during the 2010 midterms], claiming the bill was too bloated,” said a Democrat who supported Reid’s decision, explaining the leader’s logic.
Few felt as good about the decision: Republicans say the about-face will only add to an already poisonous partisan atmosphere, liberal Democrats think the bill is too small to do much good and the powerful negotiators of the bipartisan package were left embarrassed, demoralized and befuddled.
What further proof do we need that Democrats do not have the ability to lead? If this is not a sign that the Democrats are fearing the worst in November, I do not know what is. The election is going to be a very interesting one. I cannot wait till it happens.
Others: Hot Air, Michelle Malkin, The Lonely Conservative, , Left Coast Rebel, QandO, Commentary, Wake up America,Â
(H/T DRUDGE)
Video:
Via ABC NEWS:
Former President Bill Clinton was rushed to a Manhattan hospital late this afternoon, sources tell ABC News.
Clinton, 63, was transported to Columbia Presbyterian Hospital in Manhattan for a condition related to his heart.
ABC News’ chief political correspondent George Stephanopoulos reported that sources said he was taken to the hospital “likely for a stent procedure.”
Sources on Capitol Hill tell ABC News that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was seen leaving the Oval Office a short time ago and did not seem “too concerned” or “in a rush.
Politics is one thing, real life is another; My Thoughts and Prayers are with the President and his Family tonight.
A Statement from the Clinton circle: (H/T Politico)
Douglas Band, counselor to former President Bill Clinton, said in a statement:: “President Bill Clinton was admitted to the Columbia Campus of New York Presbyterian Hospital after feeling discomfort in his chest. Following a visit to his cardiologist, he underwent a procedure to place two stents in one of his coronary arteries. President Clinton is in good spirits, and will continue to focus on the work of his Foundation and Haiti’s relief and long-term recovery efforts.”
Again, my thoughts and best wishes to the Clinton Family tonight.
Just an FYI:
Southern Baptist Pastor Wiley Drake of Buena Park sent out an email Monday night, saying that perhaps his prayers had been answered with the death of Rep. John Murtha yesterday.
âMaybe God took him out,â Drake wrote. âMaybe God Answered our IMPRECATORY prayer that we prayed every 30 days.â
The Pennsylvania congressman, a decorated former Marine who fiercely opposed the Iraq war, died at the age of 77 after complications from gallbladder surgery.
I asked Drake if his statements werenât distasteful, particularly coming immediately after Murthaâs death. He said that as a Christian, he didnât buy into the sentiment of not speaking ill of the dead.
âItâs not distasteful to pray the word of God and include somebodyâs name,â he said. âI didnât celebrate his death. I said maybe it was Godâs answer to our imprecatory prayer.â
Drake regularly asks his âprayer warriorsâ to participate in prayer targeting âunrighteousâ politicians. He typically uses Psalms 109, including these passages including in his Monday email: âLet his days be few; and let another take his office.â And, âLet his children be fatherless, and his wife a widow.â
via Buena Park pastor prayed for Murthaâs death – Total Buzz : The Orange County Register.
First off, this idiot does not speak for me. Yes, I am a Baptist. Yes, I am Christian. However, I think it its VERY UnChristlike to pray for ANYONE’S Death!
So, Yeah, this Douche Nozzle does not speak for me.
That is all.
Nothin’ to blog about today.
Nothing that I want to waste bandwidth on anyhow.
I might go shoot a video of the snow outside.
As Iran approaches what could be the defining moment in an uprising that few thought would last this long or become this strong, perhaps Iranâs leaders should keep their gaze focused on the earth. Itâs shifting beneath them.
The dude disagrees with Megan McCain and the best this moron can do is mock her damned weight? đĄ
How fucking Juvenile can you be? đ
This is the same asshole, who offered up my IP address to anyone who wanted it; all because I said something about Obama, that he deemed racist. But the very next day publishes the very unfunny and quite racist “OSAMA-OBAMA’ moniker on his own damned blog. He removed it, after I said something about it. I wish I had screen capped it, but I didn’t.
This is the stupidity that I refer to in my Blog’s subtitle at the top.
Hypocrisy, thy name is Dan Riehl.
Oh man, that is REALLY going to drag the hits in here…. HEH! đ
Okay, seeing you most likely did come here to see something dirty.
Here’s a HumpBot video:
Click here to watch the video.
Although, I will say this; the liberal’s mocking of her is quite silly to watch, here’s an example: (H/T Pam G)
Although, I will say this. —- Pam, if you happen to read this; going after Ron Reagan, about his own dad like that was a bit classless. Let’s not play their game. They (being the liberals in general…) are idiots, we both know that. But doing what you did on there only makes us look bad. Let’s not stoke the talking points furnace no more than we absolutely have to. Okay? I admit, I am not much of a Palin fan, at all. But the left is making themselves look like morons for bashing her. Leave the bashing stuff for the liberals on Palin. Bashing someone because of who his daddy was, is just wrong. I can see why it pissed off Ron Reagan. I just wouldn’t have went there, that’s all. I’m just saying.
I doubt very highly that she would even read that, much less heed my advice. But I thought I’d mention it.
I start this entry out with a very funny quote by AllahPundit:
Iâm officially confused.
Heh! What else is new? I kid, I kid! Allah’s a good ol’ fellow, when he’s asleep. đ He would be an even BETTER fellow, if he would link to me, once in a stinkin’ while. But alas, I was placed on the blacklist over something that happened eons ago, back when I was on the wrong side of the political fence. All I will say about it is, I thought Catholic Churches taught the doctrine of forgiveness? So much for that, I suppose. đ It amazes me, that those who toot their horns the loudest about being Christians, and decry the immorality of the Liberals; are the ones who act like it the least. Just sayin’ AP, Just saying. (I’m saying all this, because I know damned well he reads the trackback links. I also know he knows what I am referring to, as does Ed…. and besides, traffic’s low around here, I need to start something! đ )
Anyhow, Filipino Conservative political hacks aside; ( đŻ ) I am referring to this story in the Dallas Morning News, that has some telling news about the Ron Paul’s chances of getting reelected in light of the Tea Party Movement:
Paul, the Gulf Coast congressman whose 2008 presidential run excited libertarians nationwide, even though he didnât get much traction overall, is considered by many to be the âfather of the Tea Parties.â But he has three opponents in the March Republican primary â more than he has faced in his past six primary campaigns combinedâŠ
John Gay, Paulâs third opponent, said he has attended several Tea Parties and related meetings. Both Wall, a machine supervisor, and Graney, a former small-business owner, have helped organize local rallies.
Tea Party associations aside, many of the challengersâ criticisms echo concerns of Paulâs past opponents: that he is too focused on his national ambitions; that his views are too extreme; that he doesnât support the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan; that he votes ânoâ on everything, including federal aid for his district after Hurricane Ike.
âThe word I keep hearing is âineffective,â â said Gay, a school business administrator. âThis district is not really being represented as it could be.â
AllahPundit does not understand why they’re targeting him. Well, It could be that Paul voted against Hurricane assistance after Ike hit down there in Taxes.
A couple of other things come to mind as well. First off, I believe people in his district and elsewhere are just sick and tired of his political grandstanding. Ron Paul just tends to say no; for the sake of saying no. Which is not exactly representing the people of his district. Also two, I believe of his district are just not happy with his stance on the war on terror. Paul and his Paleo-Conservative ilk are one’s who side with the left, that mostly believes that America itself is the result of terrorism and that, I am very sorry to say, is an asinine charge of the highest order. Al-Qaeda has a long standing beef with us, because of our support of Israel. Something that the Paleo-Conservative right hates, because a good ninety-nine percent of them are antisemitic. Not to mention racist. This is why the “Taft Wing” of the Republican Party was called out by people like William F. Buckley Jr. and most of them were either sidelined or changed their views.
I said this in the comments section over at R.S. McCain’s Blog and I will write it here. If Tom Tencredo’s screed against Blacks, Jews and other minorities is going to be co-oped by the Tea Parties and also by the G.O.P.; you can count me among the people that will not be voting for any Republicans come 2012. I voted Libertarian in 2008 and I can, and well again, if need be. I would think that seeing there is a Black Man as the chairman of the G.O.P., that the Republican Party would take a hardcore stance against such stuff. But then again, Michael Steel is the chairman. If you know what I mean, and I think you do!
Anyhow, Paul district election should be quite interesting, and it is a sign of things to come here in November! I just cannot wait, because I just know there is going to be some major upsets come November.
You can go here to find out why:
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
As you all know, Obama spoke of a supporter, who succumbed to Cancer. Well, he could not remember her name and predictably, my fellow Conservatives mocked Obama and insinuated that he was lying about it.
Well, here she is:
Dear MoveOn member,
Earlier this week, we received incredibly sad news. Melanie Shouse, a devoted MoveOn Council leader in St. Louis and tireless health care advocate, passed away after a battle with breast cancer.
Melanie was a true fighter. While she was involved in many issues with MoveOn, she always said health care was her heartâand even after treatments began, she came to every single health care rally, speaking out about the injustices she was suffering under our broken health care system.
Melanie’s story is a painful reminder of why we need to fight as hard as we can to get real health care reform passed, now.
Our friends at TrueMajority are gathering messages of condolence to deliver to Melanie’s family this weekend. The email they sent is below. To add your message, just click this link.
http://www.truemajority.org/MelanieShouse/moveon
Thanks for all that you do.
âKat, Keauna, Ilya, Lenore, and the rest of the team
Melanie Shouse has died.
Melanie was a small business owner from Missouri battling stage four breast cancer, who also had to fight with insurance companies who didn’t want to pay for her treatment. She didn’t take that lying downâshe spoke out, she protested, she became a leader in the movement for a more just health care system. Maybe you remember the video thank-you she sent to you and other TrueMajority members last October for being part of that movement.1
The cancer took Melanie’s life last week. To her family, we can only express our deepest regret and sympathy. If you’d like to send your sympathy as well, you can sign our guest book, and we’ll deliver your messages to the family this weekend.
http://www.truemajority.org/MelanieShouse/moveon
We’re sorry we didn’t get health care reform done sooner. Sorry that insurance coverage isn’t more affordable and accessible for millions of Americans who need it. Mostly, we’re sorry to lose our friend.
But Melanie would not have wanted us to stop fighting for reform. In fact, she asked that those attending her memorial service wear their activist t-shirts. So tomorrow, in lieu of flowers, let’s deliver our condolences, put on a campaign t-shirt and remember why we fight and who we are fighting for.
-Matt
Matt Holland
TrueMajority / USAction1âhttp://www.moveon.org/r?r=86397&id=18852-8669653-2Jelyyx&t=1
Shame on my fellow Conservatives for not getting the full story, before going to press.
Others, who screwed up: Sister Toldjah, Gateway Pundit, The Greenroom, sara in italy, Flopping Aces, Hot Air, Another Black Conservative, The Jawa Report, The Lonely Conservative and Pundit & Pundette
This is just totally unbelievable:
(I apologize in advance for the video source… But it was the only place I could find it)
Video:
Here are some of highlights of the this racist, antisemitic speech:
Tancredo: Every year, the liberal Dems and the RINO Republicans turned up the temperature ever so slightly. It seemed after awhile that we’d all be boiled to death in a cauldron of the nanny state.
And then something really odd happened — mostly because we do not have a civics literacy test before people can vote in this country.
[Applause]
People who cannot even spell the word “vote,” or say it in English — [applause] — put a committed socialist ideologue in the White House. Name is Barack Hussein Obama.
You mean like my WHITE Father, who is 63 years old and has only an 8th Grade education and does not spell very well at all? Who did vote for Obama and his voted Democrat all of his life? No wonder this idiot was eliminated from the Republican primaries early on. I love my father, but I disagree with his politics. I voted for Bob Barr, and my dad respects that. But this racist antisemitic jack ass did not stop there. He went after something else, or group I should say. Jewish people!
If McCain had been elected, the neocons would be writing flattering editorials in the Weekly Standard and the Wall Street Journal. Congressman Gutierrez and President McCain would have been posing in the Rose Garden with big smiles as they received accolades from La Raza for having finally passed an amnesty.
For those who do not get it; Neo-Con is code word for JEWS. Has been with the Paleo-Conservative right and with the Far Left since Bush was elected. Those NEO-CONS! Why didn’t he just come out and say JEWS? Because he is a coward; like Ron Paul, Like Pat Buchanan and the rest of those Jew-Hating bastards, who want to blame the Jews for everything that is wrong with this Country. David Duke would be proud! In fact, here is Duke’s video, essentially saying the same damned thing:
Do you see much difference? Neither do I. đ
Shame on that Tea Party Nation for hosting this racist, Antisemitic bastard. If the Republican Party thinks that embracing idiots like this guy is going to help their cause; they are going to be in for a wake up call come election 2010. Because I can tell you right now, I will NOT vote for someone that supports a person like Tom Tancredo. Not at all. Racism and Antisemitism is morally wrong and should not be in the mainstream in politics at all.
Update: For the first time in my Blogging career, I can honestly say that Keith Olbermann is 100% correct here:
Because this is not about illegal immigrants with Tom Tancredo, this is about protecting the white race. Against the Jews, against Blacks and against those who would dare pierce the white establishment in this Country. This is why I side with those who are of sane mind, and call this hatemonger for what he is. I am shocked that my follow bloggers on my side of asle are not more enraged about this, as I am. It speaks of the Conservative Movement and its unwillingness to take a stand against hate speech.
(H/T AP)
This a quite funny, and the underlying point is taken as well:
| The Daily Show With Jon Stewart | Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c | |||
| The Blogs Must Be Crazy | ||||
| ||||
I hate to say it, but Jack Hunter makes a good point here.
Click here for the transcript.
Well, they are a little slow:
Here is a fact: Barack Obama has trouble generating enthusiasm among white working class voters. Thatâs not because they are white. He would have had trouble winning support among black working class voters if they had been unable to identify with him because he was black. He has trouble with working class voters because he appears to them as coming from a different world, a different realm of experience, a different class, if you like. And thatâs because he does.
I have recently read several stories about Obama that treat these difficulties as if they were paradoxical. The latest is from The Washington Post. âDespite his roots,â the article is headlined, âObama struggles to show heâs connected to middle class.â And the storyâwhich seems to use middle class, working class, and blue collar interchangeablyâdescribes his supposedly non-elitist roots as follows: âHe turned down high-paying jobs after graduating from Harvard Law School and became a community organizer, compelled by the experience of growing up with a single mother who sometimes lived on food stamps. He married a woman from a working-class family on the South Side of Chicago, and they rented a walk-up condominium in Hyde Park.â
The first thing to note about this description is that, like many accounts I have read of Obamaâs life, it gets its facts wrong. He didnât become a community organizer after graduating from Harvard Law School, but after graduating from Columbia. He left community organizing to attend Harvard Law School. After graduating from law school, he joined a prestigious Chicago law firm with offices just off Michigan Avenue. In 1991, he began teaching constitutional law at the University of Chicago. He was chair of a Chicago branch of the Annenberg Foundation. Obamaâs wife, who admittedly did grow up working-class, nevertheless graduated from Princeton and Harvard Law School. And Hyde Park is a pricey upper-middle-class section of Chicago.
Who wrote this? A Republican? A Conservative? Nope. A card-carrying Marxist. Here is his profile on Wikipedia. This guy is about as left wing as it gets. When the Marxists are saying that Obama is a rich, out of touch, elitist, then it is a good sign that he just might be that.
Of course, I knew this; hell, every damned Conservative and Republican Blogger knew this since the time that Obama shot forward in the primaries in 2007. However, there is a broader point that I believe some Bloggers are missing here and I guess I will have to be the one to say this. Most politicians are not your typical, “Lay in the gutter”, lower middle class bums, who have never done anything in life. Most politicians, Liberal and Conservative, are successful people, who have actually made something of themselves, and actually worked for what money they have. In other words, it was not given to them by the Government; like the Marxists think it should be.
I might grudge President Obama for many things, his sissified stance on Terrorism, his disastrous domestic policy, and so on. But there is one thing that I will never grudge him for, and that is the that he actually went to school and became a lawyer. I have no gripes with the fact that the man is financially well off. There are those who might, and they have their point, I suppose. But I do not fault a man, who is successful, that is a socialist mentality. Which is against the wealthy or successful man. I used to think like that; but no longer. I figure if a man is successful at something, God Bless him for it. That is the American dream and I find no fault in anyone who is a success at what they do.
History will record that these remarks from his State of the Union address were the only case legendary barrister Barack Obama ever argued before the Supreme Court. And he lost.
Even when presented with a short, straightforward, simply stated question by Rep. Mike Pence, Obama couldn’t help but to formulate a different question.
Pence asked: “Mr. President, will you consider supporting across-the-board tax relief, as President Kennedy did?”
The question Obama wanted Pence to ask was: Mr. President, will you join Republicans in cutting taxes of billionaires?
Luckily, Obama’s reformulation gave him an opening for a killer answer: “What you may consider across-the-board tax cuts could be, for example, greater tax cuts for people who are making a billion dollars. I may not agree to a tax cut for Warren Buffett.”
Republicans should take that answer and run like a thief in the night! OK, let’s cut taxes on everyone except billionaires. I’d even support a specific tax expressly on Warren Buffett. Now, son, how much will you give us for these magic beans?
If only Republicans could maneuver Obama into answering a question on abortion, we could probably get him to agree to ban all abortions â– except in the case of teenage girls who have been raped by their fathers. (This is how I assume Obama would rephrase the question.)
No conservative argues like this. To the contrary, we’re morose that Nexis archives are not more complete, so we can’t quote liberals directly more often.
I posted part of this last night. Here is a the complete interview, both parts.
Update: I would remiss, if I did not quote this:
Thatâs a cute point he makes about the progression (or non-progression) from Richard Reid to Abdulmutallab over the course of eight years, but what about Madrid, the London bombings, or even the NYC subway plot that was busted in September? Heâs either awfully ill informed or awfully glib about the severity of the threat. Two: Laying aside his bizarre shrugging at nuclear proliferation among jihadist states, in which dimension of reality did he discover that Iran is reliably, conclusively, indubitably âself-preservationistâ? Given the regimeâs intent on maintaining its own power at all costs, including by murdering protesters, thereâs no reason to think it wouldnât do something rash if it felt that power slipping from its fingers. What does it have to lose by firing a missile at Israel under those circumstances?
That is coming from someone, that was, not somewhere in Mid-America when the twin towers were hit; but like within a mile of the towers, when the planes went in. Many people do not get AllahPundit. I do, and this posting here, will help you understand him as well. I remember being scared out of my mind, when I got the news, that there was a plane on the way to the White House, that plane was flight 93. I could never even begin to imagine the horror of it being in my own town. Closest thing is the failed Detroit terrorist attack. I give AllahPundit, for all of his stuff that I do not agree with; mad props for being brave enough to stand up and say this sort of a thing and for continuing to Blog against Terrorism, and Jihad, despite being threatened. Good Job my friend and keep it up.