I sit here tonight, as a former “left of center” Blogger, amazed at what has become of the party, that I once used to just blindly vote for every year. I fully understand what Ronald Reagan was referring to, when he quoted Al Smith in his 1964 speech called “Rendezvous with Destiny.”  It just seems to me that the Liberals in this country of ours, instead of listening to the other side of the political fence and possibly learning from them, are more interested in mocking them and living in their own altered state of reality. Conversely, I have been told that this is nothing new, Democrats have been doing this for years.
Earlier tonight, I was over looking around on a well-known liberal Blog called Crooks and Liars, which, for those of you who are not normally of the Blogging community is a rather humorous reference to former President Richard M. Nixon’s statement of, “I am not a crook.” John Amato, A liberal from California, runs that rather interesting Blog. Â Earlier tonight, John made a rather flippant comment that burned me to my core, and as a result, I felt the need to write about it, and the person, of whom he was referring.
John Amato was reporting on a Conservative Radio host from Alaska, who rather idiotically, made some rather nasty comments about some women holding a Anti-Sarah Palin rally in Alaska, and also about him giving their personal cell phone numbers out, whereby causing some of them to receive threats.  The host was suspended a week, without pay, which I feel was ample punishment. To be fair to the Host, he was not aware that the numbers given out were personal cell phone numbers.
It was not the reporting of the incident that annoyed me to my core, it was the rather offhanded, mean spirited comment that was attached to the reporting of that story, that warranted this Editorial. The comment that sent me over the rails, the comment, that I feel, was a shot over the bow of a rather highly intelligent woman, who I feel is unique spokesperson for American Conservative values in this Country.
“Acting like Michelle Malkin does have some consequences after all.”
That, Mr. Amato, is over the line. I will explain why. However, I do not expect you, being locked into your bastardly Liberal mindset, to understand why I feel so damned strongly about this. Nevertheless, I will try to make your rather simple liberal mind understand the questions I am about to ask you. I realize it might be a crab shoot with you, but I am in need of a challenge this evening and you are the target of interest.
- Do you believe that Michelle Malkin’s due diligence in reporting on the war on terror is a hateful thing? Â I would expect so, seeing most of you liberals believe that we should try to talk to people who want to see this Nation and everything it stands for destroyed.
- I suppose that you believe that Michelle Malkin’s reporting of the vandalism that happened to the Vietnam vets war memorial in Washington D.C. is a hateful thing as well?  This would not surprise me.  Seeing it is you liberals, who hate our military, to the point of wanting America to lose a war and return home in disgrace. Vietnam proved that sir.
- I suppose you would disapprove of Michelle Malkin’s resolve to “Lan Astaslem” which is Arabic for “I will not submit/surrender?” This is a pledge that we as Americans will not submit or surrender to Islamic extremists who want to strike fear into the American people and ruin our livelihoods, something that I also believe in, to my very core. I say this because it is you and your Liberal friends wish to appease those who want to destroy this Nation.
Yes, Michelle Malkin and I do have our differences. Her brand of Conservatism is a bit different from mine. I do not agree with every thing that she writes. I am not a “Malkin-bot,” a funny term that I gave to some of her supporters, who tend to be, what I and Andrew P. Napolitano like to call sheep. However, that is about where the differences end. When it comes to matters of National Defense and Defending our Military against those who would like to see it destroyed, including brain-dead liberals like you, Ted Kennedy, Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reid.  I am, in fact, in agreement with her on these issues.
In closing, let me simply say this. The Democrats talk about change. Well, this year is going to be a major change for me as well. For the first time, since I have legally eligible to vote, I will be not voting for a Democrat. This is because the party that I used to just blindly vote for, in every election has totally drifted beyond the point that I feel to be acceptable in American politics. I am sorry, but I cannot and will not vote for a Party’s candidate, whose politics resemble that of Karl Marx or that of the Nazi Party.  Furthermore, I will not vote for a candidate whose party abdicated its core principles in the Primary and at the convention, just so they could hurry up and get their nominee.
This is to say nothing of the communist socialist agenda, Â the wholesale slaughter of innocent babies, the outright attack of the Judeo-Christian Faith, The Promotion and advocating of the Atheistic movement and the furtherance of the Homosexual agenda, the promoting of Identity Politics within the African-American community, in response to a perceived and mostly falsely assumed attack on the Negro Race.
All of these things are why this Blogger will be voting differently on November 4, 2008.
Technorati Tags: 9/11, Abortion, Afghanistan, America, Barack Obama, Bob Barr, Bush, Cheney, Christanity, Communist, Congress, Conservative, Consitution, Democrat, Democrats, Editorial, Election ’08, Election 2008, First Admendment, Freedom of Speech, Government, Identity Politics, Iran, Iraq, Islam, Israel, John McCain, Judaism, Liberal, Liberals, Libertarian, McCain, Michelle Malkin, Military, Muslim, Nationalism, Neo-Conservatives, Obama, Opinion, Politics, Race Baiting, Religion, Republican, Republicans, Sarah Palin, Stupidity, Support Our Troops, Taliban, Terrorism, War, War on Terrorism, Washington DC, White House, Whites, racism
