Is because of comments I get like this, this dimwit is referring to this posting here:
Author : Mandamus (IP: 142.179.209.10 , wacnetwork2.ab.hsia.telus.net)
E-mail : aj.barker@gmail.com
URL Β Β :
Whois Β : http://ws.arin.net/cgi-bin/whois.pl?queryinput=142.179.209.10
Comment:
You can’t say “A fact confirmed” and “Fox News” in the same sentence without destroying your own credibility.
Oh Really?
Lets looks at the ratings shall we?
This comes from TV by the numbers:
Live + Same Day Cable News Daily Ratings for February 15, 2011
P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s) Total Day
FOXN
1,129 276 546 CNN
384 130 175 MSNB
464 114 216 CNBC
210 63 107 HLN
231 100 134
Primetime
P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s) FOXN
2,214 495 1,031 CNN
632 223 281 MSNB
1,061 264 478 CNBC
324 128 142 HLN
342 114 173
Net Morning programs (6-9 AM) P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s) FOXN FOX & Friends 983 322 616 CNN American Morning 249 108 122 MSNB Morning Joe 433 95 191 CNBC Squawk Box 184 70 127 HLN Morning Express w/ Meade 326 200 253
Net 5PM P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s) FOXN GLENN BECK 1,867 429 915 CNN SITUATION ROOM 461 124 189 MSNB HARDBALL WITH C. MATTHEWS 572 127 227 CNBC FAST MONEY 166 39 93 HLN SHOWBIZ TONIGHT 194 93 107
Net 6PM P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s) FOXN SPECIAL RPT W/BRET BAIER 2,045 432 850 CNN SITUATION ROOM 502 189 243 MSNB MSNBC LIVE 563 123 247 CNBC MAD MONEY 193 69 123 HLN PRIME NEWS 240 80 103
Net 7PM P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s) FOXN THE FOX REPORT W/S.SMITH 1,922 541 957 CNN JOHN KING USA 451 183 244 MSNB HARDBALL WITH C. MATTHEWS 806 183 358 CNBC KUDLOW REPORT 188 64 94 HLN ISSUES 341 105 189
Net 8PM P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s) FOXN THE OREILLY FACTOR 3,017 686 1,393 CNN PARKER SPITZER 444 142 184 MSNB LAST WORD W/ L. ODONNELL 1,000 219 409 CNBC FACEBOOK OBSESSION, THE 265 140 121 HLN NANCY GRACE 482 134 225
Net 9PM P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s) FOXN HANNITY 2,196 468 1,005 CNN Piers Morgan Tonight 710 280 304 MSNB RACHEL MADDOW SHOW 1,265 321 555 CNBC 60 Minutes ON CNBC 386 139 153 HLN NANCY GRACE-MISSING 276 99 171
Net 10PM P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s) FOXN ON THE RECORD W/GRETA 1,427 331 693 CNN ANDERSON COOPER 360 740 246 355 MSNB ED SHOW 919 252 468 CNBC 60 Minutes ON CNBC 320 104 153 HLN JOY BEHAR 287 117 138
Net 11PM P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s) FOXN THE OREILLY FACTOR 1,141 409 655 CNN ANDERSON COOPER 360 378 161 173 MSNB LAST WORD W/ L. ODONNELL 510 139 278 CNBC MAD MONEY 102 39 49 HLN SHOWBIZ TONIGHT 268 120 138 –
Note: We post all the cable news ratings we get. We donβt have ratings for any time periods not shown above.
For other days cable news ratings click here.
P2+ = viewers over the age of 2
(25-54) = Adults 25-54 viewing
(35-64) = Adults 35-64 viewing
Prime Time = 8-11pm
I do believe that if anyone has a credibility problem sir, it is you. Numbers do no lie. Fox News Channel is the highest rated news network right now. That might have something to do with the fact they do not kowtow down to your liberal President’s bull crap, nor do they play his propaganda game. Liberalism and big governess are a losing game. Freedom is popular and you, my little liberal idiot friend, are on the wrong side of that game. Period, end of discussion.
Actually, the number of viewers is unrelated the credibility of a network. Would we say Wikipedia is accurate because it is one of the most viewed sites on the web?
This is an age-old fallacy called argumentum ad populum (“appeal to the people”) or argumentum ad numerum (“appeal to the number”). The majority of Americans used to believe in slavery, Jim Crow, etc., but we all agree that it still is not right.
Numbers might be helpful for winning a campaign or influencing some issue, but numbers alone do not and cannot comprise a substantive argument.
Yeah, you would get all on technical on me. π π
A very good argument. BTW… and without insults too. very well done.
The truth is; the reason why Fox News does so well, is because the American people know, when they are being spun by the media. Americans are much, much, more smarter than the liberal elite establishment give them credit for. When Fox News was in defense mode of Bush, their numbers were horrible and the news corp stocks were in the toliet. That changed after Fox FINALLY stopped playing cheerleader. Which happened after about 2007. Now, they are the ONLY network that dares to tell the truth about socialism, and as a result, they are doing very well.
I just could not get over the idiot leaving that comment. Liberals just plain stupid! Plain and simple. π
I prefer to get my news elsewhere. None of the networks are all that reliable, so I opt for C-SPAN. Some would argue that debating the best network is like trying to figure out which country has the best dictator.
I hear ya…. I don’t watch 247 fox news, maybe a little during the day, I catch Bill O’ at night. Sean Hannity is okay, if you can stomach the water carrying.
I’ve sampled many of the commentators on all of the major news networks. In the end, many of them attempt to spoon feed opinions to viewers without giving people the background necessary to understand the issues at hand. When we read a bill, listen to our representatives speak, or watch dialog between countries of the Middle East, we get that information unadulterated. While it is helpful to hear a commentator speak of his or her opinion, it is painful to watch parts of our country fall apart due to the lack of education. I feel that we see this from all perspectives, which is being driven partly by an insistence upon strict ideology versus practicality and realism.
That’s a pretty fair argument and I thank you for the comments.
This is also why I watch Bill O’Reilly, instead of Sean Hannity. Bill O. is simply an independent, who believes in traditional values. Something I can relate to. Sean Hannith is a confirmed Republican and he recites their talking points. Like MSNBC, CNN, NPR and the rest do the left’s.
I listen to Bill, because he is fair, and does not let the politico’s spin him.
Yeah, he’s a little on the arrogant side. But he is also very smart and knows the game. Why I like him. π
Also, I feel the need to say this; the reason why this person left this comment. Is his feeling is this, “Because Fox News does not agree with my liberal politics, it is not credible.” Which is, if your are sane, rational, and yes, even thinking American; Laughable.
I posted those rating numbers, not because I happen to believe that Fox News is perfect; by no means do I believe that. They tend to defend Neo-Conservatism heavily, which I disagree with. However, I posted it because I happen to believe, again, that the American people are just not people that like to be lied to; and this President and his polices have been an abysmal failure all around —- and the American people know it. This is why they get their news from Fox News now more than any of the other networks. That is because the leftist or MSM media, went into “Hosanna, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of Socialism” after the election and the media did his bidding. Until it became a losing business decision and now, SOME, not all, are now criticizing the President. But not nearly as much as you see on Fox News.
Fox News has a Conservative bias — when did that become a crime? Fox defends Businesses, when did that become a crime? The problem is, socialists are so ate up with their hatred of anyone who dares to be a capitalist, at all. That they deride Fox as the grand evil incarnate and it is so damned silly and the people of America see right through that nonsense.
Which explains why Fox News has the ratings now. π