Michael Goldfarb in his Wilsonian Magazine writes:
Given that Palin is basically in a statistical tie with Romney and Huckabee for the pole position in the 2012 primary, it’s not clear why Steele keeps shooting his mouth off about a favorite among the rank and file, but he’d be well advised to zip it. Also, it would be helpful if Steele could just let us know which candidates he is grooming so that the party can quarantine them in case the stupidity is contagious.
Gee Mike, I wonder; would you have written that about Steele if he were a White Man? I highly doubt it. Further more, this speaks to the desire of the Wilsonian, Neo-Conservative wing of the Republican Party to want to still control that Party.
The man and his Wilsonian counterparts ought to just face facts, they lost; because of their elected leaders idiotic nonsense for past 8 years, They lost the country to a Neo-Liberal. Which now is going to lead the Nation down a very hard path. That what happens when you put Zionistic ideology in front of the best interests of the Country.
No wonder John McCain lost the election and more recently, no wonder Rupert Murdock sold that idiotic magazine off. 
I find it amusing that someone can call another man racist while using the term “zionist” in the same sentence.
If that isn’t the kettle criticizing the Pot for being covered in soot, then I don’t know what is!
Excuse me while i’s shuffle off to Buffalo.
Well, I call ’em as I see ’em.
Michael Goldfarb works for a Neo-Conservative owned and funded Magazine. Which stands for a unreasonable amount of Israeli Influence in American politics.
Further more, Goldfarb during the 2008 Presidential election, did little or nothing to mask his racial hatred of President Barack Obama.
In short, the man is an asshole and I will cap his chickenhawk ass any chance I get.
That is all,
-Pat
Paleo Pat asks, “Would you have written about Steele if he were a white man?”
I detect no racial animus in the criticism of Steele. In fact, I have detected that the party as a whole has been far too quick to embrace Steele, precisely because he is black, in an attempt to hold him up and declare themselves non-racist. While the party is not nearly as racist as its critics would like to impune,…the artificial regard and supposed respect the party claims it has for Steele is itself racist,…defeating their goal for which they would hope to use him.
Regardless of his color, Steele is bad for the party because he is a RINO,…end of story. Any further speculation about motives of those opposed to Steel from within Republican ranks is pointless, and actually serves to confuse the issue.
Michael Steele is bad because he is Michael Steele,…and for no other reason.