UPDATED: My atheist stalker

Posted onAuthorPatrick7 Comments

It seems that Ed Brayton is lacking in his homosexual fulfillment again and once again is linking to my blog.

This turd pawns himself off as a libertarian. But in reality, he’s nothing more than a hate-mongering leftist, who’s bigoted against anyone who disagrees with his worldview. It’s typical leftist behavior. In fact, it was his bigotry and strange fixation with the religious right, that got him tossed from science blogs. In short, they told him to get lost with the hate or leave. This comes from three different sources and was verified by the site admins.

Just an FYI, you come from his blog and you leave an troll or moby comment, I’ll just delete it. Why? because I can. I figure I deal with enough and Ed’s just an butthole leftist. He or his mindless followers deserve no stage here.

I don’t mind people who disagree with me. Heck, I don’t even mind atheists; AllahPundit being a perfect example, but this turd, is just a hater. I call him gay, because of his unnatural fixation with me —- and because I know it tweaks him off, and there is nothing he can do about it —- which brings me some satisfaction.

In fact, he likes to accuse me of being a bully, but it was HIM who told those who questioned his attacking of me to leave, if they did not like it. Bullies never like dissent; it’s a part if their fascist nature. Unlike me, Ed Brayton wants to see people, like me, censored even silenced. Which, again, is their nature. Simply put, leftists hate Christians, Israel and true freedom.

Update: I shut down the comments on this posting; like I said, I don’t think Ed Brayton’s band of MOBY’s and trolls deserve a stage here. So, I shut down the platform. I won’t be responding to this loser again, that is what he wants —- the spiritually depraved loon.

 

 

7 Replies to “UPDATED: My atheist stalker”

  1. Pat,

    I love you, dude. I read your blog everyday. But you’re wrong on this one. If your writing and opinions aren’t up to snuff, you have to take steps to fix it. If you really want to be taken seriously in the blog world, you can’t let yourself get lost in rants, name calling, and the like, and then complain when someone calls you on it.

    You can’t call someone ‘gay’ as a negative slur and expect to be approached with humility and respect. You can’t write that (in effect) a woman’s place is in the home, and expect that people will take your policy stances seriously. Those are untenable beliefs.

    Now, please note I did not say you can’t believe those things. You can believe whatever you want, and I will defend to my last breath your right to do so. But the blogosphere is a free market system, and any success or criticism you get is all on you, buddy. Nobody writes here but you. Believe what you want, but success in this realm isn’t going to happen when you let fly with the kind of drivel that Ed has called you out on.

    Enemies (as it were) will provide you a far better opportunity for improvement than a legion of kool-aid swilling acolytes.

    I write this because I appreciate your writings and your point of view.

    1. I love you, dude.

      (said in best Curly Howard imitating a woman’s voice)

      I bet you tell that to all the boys! 😉


      I read your blog everyday.

      Sorry about your luck! 😆 😀 No, seriously… really!?!?! Wow. 😯

      If your writing and opinions aren’t up to snuff, you have to take steps to fix it.

      My writing I will cop to needing a bit of brush up; there are times when I rush out a post and stuff comes out looking unpolished. Excuse the hell outta me for having A.D.H.D. and yes I do really have it. 😡 This is what pisses me off about Ed; he’s nothing more than an elitist, condescending twit.

      As for my opinions; you and anyone else who reads my blog —- from over there — who thinks for one single solitary second, that you or anyone else, will EVER change my opinions; you are ALL out of your proverbial trees!

      You can’t call someone ‘gay’ as a negative slur and expect to be approached with humility and respect.

      Yeah, but Ed can come to my blog and go to his and berate me for being a Christian eh? I got one thing to say about all that — BULLCRAP!

      Another thing too; I could honest give two flips who respects me and who does not really. I don’t write this blog to get respect; I write this blog, because I despise people who want to take my freedoms from me. I barked and griped about George W. Bush and his Neoconservative horse hockey and his massive screw up, from the floor up in Iraq and I am continuing to do the same thing with this idiotic tool Marxist President we got now! Now, has my politics and political leanings evolved? Heck yes!

      You can’t write that (in effect) a woman’s place is in the home, and expect that people will take your policy stances seriously. Those are untenable beliefs.

      Oh really? Tell that to the folks who write the Holy Scriptures!:

      and I quote to you:

      Let the husband render unto the wife due benevolence: and likewise also the wife unto the husband. The wife hath not power of her own body, but the husband: and likewise also the husband hath not power of his own body, but the wife. (1 Corinthians 7:3-4 KJV)

      and….

      Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body. Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing. Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it; (Ephesians 5:22-25 KJV)

      and…:


      Nevertheless let every one of you in particular so love his wife even as himself; and the wife see that she reverence her husband. (Ephesians 5:33 KJV)

      and….:

      If any be blameless, the husband of one wife, having faithful children not accused of riot or unruly. (Titus 1:6 KJV)

      and the most important scripture that PROVES my point:

      Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. For Adam was first formed, then Eve. And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression. Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in faith and charity and holiness with sobriety. (1 Timothy 2:11-15 KJV)

      There, argue with God, he wrote it, I didn’t.


      Now, please note I did not say you can’t believe those things. You can believe whatever you want, and I will defend to my last breath your right to do so. But the blogosphere is a free market system, and any success or criticism you get is all on you, buddy. Nobody writes here but you. Believe what you want, but success in this realm isn’t going to happen when you let fly with the kind of drivel that Ed has called you out on.

      to that I say:

      Jud 1:3 Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common salvation, it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort you that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints.

      I don’t write to please mortal men. I write the truth, because the Bible says I have to.

      End of story.

      But thanks for your comments! 😀

  2. “As for my opinions; you and anyone else who reads my blog —- from over there — who thinks for one single solitary second, that you or anyone else, will EVER change my opinions; you are ALL out of your proverbial trees! ”

    Duly noted. If you’re unwilling to even consider changing your opinions, then you’re not worth talking to. When people disagree about something and one (or both) parties refuse to reevaluate their positions, then any conversation will simply go around in circles, and no constructive discussion can occur. I hope someday you will discover the value of actual dialogue.

    1. I hope someday you will discover the value of actual dialogue.

      Dialog. Another word for changing your views to suit others.

      Keep dreaming! 🙄

      There is no dialog with two types of people; Communist/leftists/Progressives and heathens/unbelievers.

      Learn it and live it.

      1. Dialog. Another word for changing your views to suit others.

        No, it’s about changing your views to fit reality. The idea, at least as J.S. Mill envisioned it, is that true propositions are made more clearly true when set against false ones, so the correct beliefs you hold are supported and the false ones identified (which you should then desire to change). cactusren is dead on.

        Also, when has Ed ever berated you solely on the basis of your religion? Don’t confuse criticism of views you have that are religious with criticism of views because they are religious.

Comments are closed.